نمونه Writing های تافل iBT خود را در این تاپیک قرار دهید.

[ice]

این تاپیک خیلی غیر فعاله ولی باز من انشا رو میزارم لطفا اگر کسی دیدش بگه غلطی داره یا نه  و...

The main idea of both the reading and the lecture is about a professional portrait which is resembles to the Jane Austen's face. Considering this, the author claims that there are several reasons which lead us to believe that Austen was the subject of the portrait. The professor, on the other hand,  categorically denies whatever was mentioned in the reading through by citing several reasons sources
 
First, the reading states that Austen's family announced that the subject of the portrait was Jane Austen. The professor refutes this point by states stating that they announced this assertion  many years later after she died. Therefore, their claim could not be true.
 
Second, the author claims that the face in the portrait is similar to Jane Austen so and that it was found in one of the Cassandra's sketches. However, the professor contends that it is does not significantly resemble to Austen's face;. Thus, it maybe/might belong to one of the another Austen's family members.
 
 
Third, the reading states that there is an evidence that shows the portrait was painted by Ozias, who probably was hired by Austen's family to paint Jane Austen’s face. The lecture opposes this point by saying that Ozias was not living in London when Jane Austen was living there as a teenager, and when Ozias went to London Jane Austen had was about 27 years old.

سلام ممنون میشم دوستان یهنگاهی هم به رایتینگ من بندازین
 When it comes to the issue of spending too much money on pets, some people believe that there are not better uses for this money, while others hold the opposite view. As far as I am concerned, the latter attitude carries more weight. In what follows I would like to address some conspicuous aspects  of from my point of view
 
The most compelling point of reason why I believe that people can spend this money in more beneficial matters is that there are lots of children who lose their parents in childhood and need someone not only as a support, but also as a friend. Moreover, according to the research which was conducted by one of the most reputable universities in my country, most people take care of pets to alm ("alms" means money given to the poor. Maybe you meant "calm") themselves. Therefore, communicating with a child instead of an animal will be more effective for those who take custody of a child. My uncle did not have had any children for many years. Eventually, they took custody of a little boy and added more excitment and enjoymen to their life.
 
Another rationale (rationale usually means a "set of reasons" not one reason use it carefully) of why I do not concur with the first perspective in the introductory paragraph, is that there are many charitable organizations which people can donate some money in and feel more satisfaction. On the other hand, taking care of an animal at home has its downsides and can cause more problems for the boss due to the fact that animals are iuncontrollable.  My sister has a cat; the cat that always damages the furnitures and breaks the glasses tools at home.
 
Nevertheless, what I alluded to in the two body paragraph should not be overgeneralized. That is /in other words, there might be a situation in which having a pet at home is the best way for people to spend their money. For example, one of my friends found a small bird in the street which was injured by an in colluision with a car. He brought that bird at home and spent lots of money for hospitalising it; after some days the bird was cured but could not fly. Therefore, he decided to take care of it forever permanantly.
 
In the final analysis(Not an appropriate phrase in this case. You could use "To summarize", or something similar), situations what that I mentioned about my friend is are fairly rare which and cannot be taken as a general rule. Therefore, I agree with the view that there are many better uses rather than spending money on pets. 
 
 
 
 
 
A secure job right away or wait for a more satisfying job?
When it comes to the issue of trying to find a job some people believe that a secure job right away is not as suitable as waiting for a more satisfying job, while others hold the opposite view. As far as I am concerned, the latter attitude carries more weight. In what Bellow, I would like to illustrate my reasons for this view point (view point does not have the same meaning as "point of view")
 
The most important feature of a job for me is the amount of enjoyment that I have experience while doing it. According to the research which was done by one of the most reputable universityies in my country, peoples feelings and attitudes have a great impact on their efficiency. I will exemplify my point with a true story about something that once happened for to me. My uncle has a company, when I graduated from university, he offered me to work a job as an accountant in his company.  Unfortunately, I did not enjoy it very much at all, but I was in urgent need of money, so I accepted it immediately. After Some days, while working, I lost would loose my temper very fast and goet tired at work. Besides, I could not communicate well with clients (appropriately). That is Therefore, I quit the  my job and decided to find a more enjoyable job one.

 
Another reason why I do not concur with the first opinion in the introductory, is that most people in the world go to work for (in order) to makeing money. By accepting a secure job, they not only can not …. their life, but they lose also the time  which can spend could be spent on finding a more satisfying and well-paiding job. The more income one has, the more comfortable life and self-confidence he has.
 
 
Nevertheless, what I mentioned in the two body previous paragraphs should not be overgeneralized. There are some people who prefer to take the first job, even though it is less profitable, which is offered to them. Their view can be partly reasonable and there might be a situation in which they can learn from their current job for preparing in the future and get gain experience. I admit that in my example about my first job in my uncle's company, I got a variety of new propitious experiences which was  proved beneficial for my latter future job.
 
From what was expressed above, we can conclude that what I mentioned about my useful experiences in a company and situations like that, are occasionally acceptable and very rare. Therefore, we can not use it as a general rule. What would happen for me if my experiences in the first job were totally different from my new job? So I strongly agree with the second perspective in the introductory paragraph.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

* معني بخش آبي مشخص نبود.