05-10-2014, 09:49 PM
ممنون میشم نظرتونو درباره این رایتینگ اینتگریتد بگید
Online encyclopedias Vs. printed encyclopedias
The reading article states that while online encyclopedias are beneficial they have some very important problems that makes them unreliable, on the contrary the listening article disagrees with the reading passage, and refutes all of the allegations expressed by the reading article one by one.
First, the reading passage articulates that because users who are not academically trained are involved in the process of writing online encyclopedias' articles, these encyclopedias suffer from lack of academic credentials and reliability, however, the listening passage states that neither of the offline nor online encyclopedias are without faults and errors, but the online encyclopedias have one advantage that the offline ones don’t have. The online encyclopedias are viewed by plenty of users every day and therefore they are more likely to get corrected if an error is observed, and in this sense not only they are not less reliable but also actually are with fewer error and faults.
In addition, the reading article claims that online encyclopedias are susceptible to hackers and vandals, and provide them with opportunity to tamper the materials in the cyclopedia and fabricate wrong information, on the contrary, the lecturer believes that online encyclopedias realize the importance of internet security, and use strategies like utilizing read-only article formats and hiring expert and professionally trained special editors to prevent any fabrications.
Last but not least, the reading article states that online encyclopedias are too focused and present the viewers with articles that are partial and biased about what is important and what is not in an article. Once again, the lecturer refutes the point claimed by the reading article by saying that because space is not an issue in online encyclopedias as in offline ones, the information is more diverse and not only this is not a bad feature, but also an advantage that online encyclopedias have over offline ones, and lecturer actually believes that these are printed encyclopedias that are vulnerable to bias viewpoints stated by professional but few editors who write these encyclopedias.
Online encyclopedias Vs. printed encyclopedias
The reading article states that while online encyclopedias are beneficial they have some very important problems that makes them unreliable, on the contrary the listening article disagrees with the reading passage, and refutes all of the allegations expressed by the reading article one by one.
First, the reading passage articulates that because users who are not academically trained are involved in the process of writing online encyclopedias' articles, these encyclopedias suffer from lack of academic credentials and reliability, however, the listening passage states that neither of the offline nor online encyclopedias are without faults and errors, but the online encyclopedias have one advantage that the offline ones don’t have. The online encyclopedias are viewed by plenty of users every day and therefore they are more likely to get corrected if an error is observed, and in this sense not only they are not less reliable but also actually are with fewer error and faults.
In addition, the reading article claims that online encyclopedias are susceptible to hackers and vandals, and provide them with opportunity to tamper the materials in the cyclopedia and fabricate wrong information, on the contrary, the lecturer believes that online encyclopedias realize the importance of internet security, and use strategies like utilizing read-only article formats and hiring expert and professionally trained special editors to prevent any fabrications.
Last but not least, the reading article states that online encyclopedias are too focused and present the viewers with articles that are partial and biased about what is important and what is not in an article. Once again, the lecturer refutes the point claimed by the reading article by saying that because space is not an issue in online encyclopedias as in offline ones, the information is more diverse and not only this is not a bad feature, but also an advantage that online encyclopedias have over offline ones, and lecturer actually believes that these are printed encyclopedias that are vulnerable to bias viewpoints stated by professional but few editors who write these encyclopedias.
