ممنون میشم نطرتون رو در مورد این رایتینگ هم بدید.
Learning by reading about things or by doing things?
We have two powerful methods to learn new things. The first method is reading and the second is experience. I believe, depend of type of activities either methods may have more importance in learning process.
In subjects that contain absolute definitions like philosophy, reading and using of diverse sources is more important in learning process than experience because these subjects have a lack of visual and practical aspects. Someone that his or her major is philosophy or literature has to read a lot. For example, one of my friends is a graduate student of philosophy; he spends most of his time in libraries and reads his hard books.
On the other hand, we have many subjects that are practical, so experiences play important role on them and therefore reading materials are not so useful. For example, if you want to learn swimming or ridding bicycle, there as only one choice, try them again and again. Michele Phelps, American swimmer and the greatest Olympic champion, swims fifty kilometers every week. I guess he doesn't need to deal with books very much.
There is also a third type that I believe both method have same importance. For example, we have to pay enough attention to reading and also experience on the pre-college educations because students supposed to deal with wide ranges of knowledge. I this kind of education you need to read to be familiar with new subjects and also need to experience for best realization of what you are reading. Another example is to learn speak a foreign language that is dependent on reading and also trying to do it.
I believe Both methods, reading and experience, are important but depend on type of subject, one of them may be more important.
Learning by reading about things or by doing things?
We have two powerful methods to learn new things. The first method is reading and the second is experience. I believe, depend of type of activities either methods may have more importance in learning process.
In subjects that contain absolute definitions like philosophy, reading and using of diverse sources is more important in learning process than experience because these subjects have a lack of visual and practical aspects. Someone that his or her major is philosophy or literature has to read a lot. For example, one of my friends is a graduate student of philosophy; he spends most of his time in libraries and reads his hard books.
On the other hand, we have many subjects that are practical, so experiences play important role on them and therefore reading materials are not so useful. For example, if you want to learn swimming or ridding bicycle, there as only one choice, try them again and again. Michele Phelps, American swimmer and the greatest Olympic champion, swims fifty kilometers every week. I guess he doesn't need to deal with books very much.
There is also a third type that I believe both method have same importance. For example, we have to pay enough attention to reading and also experience on the pre-college educations because students supposed to deal with wide ranges of knowledge. I this kind of education you need to read to be familiar with new subjects and also need to experience for best realization of what you are reading. Another example is to learn speak a foreign language that is dependent on reading and also trying to do it.
I believe Both methods, reading and experience, are important but depend on type of subject, one of them may be more important.
