ممنون میشم رایتینگمو تصحیح کنید
========================================================================================================
It has been said that every thing that is learned contained in books."compare and contrast knowledge gained from books,which source is more important?Why
========================================================================================================
========================================================================================================
Some people argue that experience has a more significant effect on our knowledge.In other words they belive thet the proof of the pudding is in the eating.They argue that we can learn important life lessons by experiment diverse situations.Other people intend to use other's experiences instead. They prefer to conserve their time and rely "books". But, in my opinion the best way for learning is reading books and learn lessons from other's achievements or losses. I think there are many advatages with this method_reading the books_that make it more suitable than experiecing.
Learning by books have been common for thousand of years.That is a proper method to learn because of several reasons.The first reason that makes the books more important that experienc is that we can get an immense sum of information in a short time.For example we can underestand that the earth is circular and it has several continents and oceans on its surface by using an encyclopedia.That takes just a few minutes to read and percieve these materials.But if we wanted to find out them by ourselves and without trusting the books probably we never understood,since it would take many years,maybe even longer than our life years.SecondBookis are very cheap sources.
Sometimes, to examin objects, we are forced to spend much money on the project.For example when we want to examin the safety of a new car.In addition some objects are hazardous to experiment.For example imagin some one who does not believe that a plant is poisonous and he wants to examin it. He may get injured or even die.Plus to these reason there are many other benefits with books. In my view bokks are avalable every where and every time.We can read them and when we are not agree with idias presented in a book, we can use other books concerned with the subject and compare the idias and make an appropriate conclusion easily.furthermore there is no loss with doing this.
in comparison the results of experience may be inaccurate or irretrievable. concequently i should say that books are the best way to learn.Ofcource i percieve that experience has more vegerous impact and the result of that remains in mind for a longr time. But that does not convince me that every thing is examinable.Some times the
objects and conditionds are not avalable or it takes a long time to examin.Thus we would bwtter to rely the experiences of the past people and read the books.
Learning by books have been common for thousand of years.That is a proper method to learn because of several reasons.The first reason that makes the books more important that experienc is that we can get an immense sum of information in a short time.For example we can underestand that the earth is circular and it has several continents and oceans on its surface by using an encyclopedia.That takes just a few minutes to read and percieve these materials.But if we wanted to find out them by ourselves and without trusting the books probably we never understood,since it would take many years,maybe even longer than our life years.SecondBookis are very cheap sources.
Sometimes, to examin objects, we are forced to spend much money on the project.For example when we want to examin the safety of a new car.In addition some objects are hazardous to experiment.For example imagin some one who does not believe that a plant is poisonous and he wants to examin it. He may get injured or even die.Plus to these reason there are many other benefits with books. In my view bokks are avalable every where and every time.We can read them and when we are not agree with idias presented in a book, we can use other books concerned with the subject and compare the idias and make an appropriate conclusion easily.furthermore there is no loss with doing this.
in comparison the results of experience may be inaccurate or irretrievable. concequently i should say that books are the best way to learn.Ofcource i percieve that experience has more vegerous impact and the result of that remains in mind for a longr time. But that does not convince me that every thing is examinable.Some times the
objects and conditionds are not avalable or it takes a long time to examin.Thus we would bwtter to rely the experiences of the past people and read the books.
