رفع اشکال و نظرسنجی درمورد نمونه های Writing شما

Today natural disasters such as earthquakes and floods are happening often in all the word (often happening around the world). Every people everybody has faced or will face with these, at least one time in her/his life. In this essay i'll explain the way that people can protect themselves (the question is on governments not people).

The natural disasters are events which we can't predict or prevent them., but we can protect ourselves from their effects. Scientists found one reason for these, which is global warming (global warming is one of the reasons that scientists currently connect to these problems). It changes climate and makes the temperature rises. So it causes that the level of sea water also rises. Then the cities near the beaches will are faced with Tsunami or floods. Furthermore, earthquakes often happening in the countries that are on fault line. so Therefore, the government should work on base structures. For example, in countries wich (where) earthquakes have happened many times, they should force engineers to build apartments which are strong against earthquakes. As we know, in some countries like Japan and China they have these laws (such laws already exist). Because of that their buildings are strong enough against earthquakes with 8 richter.

In addition, the governments should empty the areas near active volcanoes, because when the volcanoes erupt, the lavas will destroy everything in its way.

In my opinion the most important work, that the government must do, is educating people how they can protect themselves from risks they face nearer to home. For example, in earthquakes they should take stay away from stuff like windows.

To sum up, I agree with educating people about risks, but it is not enough. The government should recognize the natural disasters in areas and work on base structure.

موفق باشید

Writing Task 2 – Cam 8 – Test 1
Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.

Being active in the communities is something that needs to be learned. Some people believe it is parents’ responsibility to socialize their children in a way that the children can be useful in the society, while others are interested to consider schools as an important environment to teach that. In this paper the aforementioned issue will be examined and in the conclusion part my opinion will be expressed.

Remember your childhood, you were almost unable to do even your own stuff, who taught you how to walk? How to speak? How to eat properly? For most of people these were their parents, daddy and mommy, who we grew up both physically and mentally and the foundation of our personality were established next to them. Some people believe that being a good team worker, getting along with others, being someone who can take a responsibility is his/her society are just like the other abilities that we earn and they consider the role of parents in this case very essential.

On the other hand, there are another ones who treat “being good” as an education that has be learned in school like physics and mathematics and so on, they believe that a child should learn the morality under supervision of an educated person because they consider the morality as a science that has its rules, objectives, references and so on.

In conclusion, I am interested in not separating parents from the schools. Personally, I believe that the both point of views have their advantages and disadvantages, for instance, if we dedicate school as the only teacher, we are obviously denying the essential role of parents in the process of learning about society, they spend a lot of time with their children and they are the ones who know the kids better than anyone else. In contrast, by abandoning schools and giving the whole responsibility to parents, we limit our children from a great and precious learning resource.

Being active in the communities is something that needs to be learned. Some people believe it is parents’ responsibility to socialize their children in a way that the children can be useful in the society, while others are interested to consider schools as an important environment to teach them that. In this paper the aforementioned issue will be examined and in the conclusion part my opinion will be expressed.

Remember your childhood, you were almost unable to do even your own stuff,. who taught you how to walk? How to speak? How to eat properly? For most of people these were their parents, daddy and mommy (mother and father), who we grew up with both physically and mentally and the foundation of our personality were was established next to them. Some people believe that being a good team worker, getting along with others, being someone who can take a responsibility is in his/her society are just like the other abilities that we learn and they consider the role of parents in this case very essential.

On the other hand, there are another ones who treat “being good” as an education that has to be learned in school like physics and mathematics and so on, they believe that a child should learn the morality under supervision of an educated person because they consider the morality as a science that has its rules, objectives, references and so on.

In conclusion, I am interested believe in not separating parents from the schools. Personally, I believe that the both points of views have their advantages and disadvantages, for instance, if we dedicate school as the only teacher, we are obviously denying the essential role of parents in the process of learning about society, they spend a lot of time with their children and they are the ones who know the kids better than anyone else. In contrast, by abandoning schools and giving the whole responsibility to parents, we limit our children from a great and precious learning resource.